Accounts Receivable Management Featured Article

Jack Russell Shares Insight Regarding Proper Debt Collection

November 14, 2012

Through its 30 years in business, Jack Russell Debt Collection, and tens of thousands of case studies, has developed internal procedures to recover debts from difficult-to-enforce county court judgments (CCJ). In order to give timely relief to cash flow, it is imperative to try and collect as much cash as possible, since due to the downturn in the economy, more and more businesses suffer at the hands of debts that can’t be collected.

“There is difficulty in collecting county court judgments that the debtor’s involved are usually in financial turmoil or adept at side stepping or delaying payment of their liabilities,” said a spokesperson from Jack Russell Debt Collection.

Below is a summary of some of the most effective steps used to enforce CCJs in case you have obtained a court judgment against your debtor who fails to pay the debt.

The first approach is for the debtor to be summoned to court. Regarding their ability or offer to pay, the debtor is questioned on oath, once in court. Rather than submitting themselves to this process, according to Jack Russell, which identifies this approach as one of the most effective, many debtors will pay up.

Delivering a high conversion to installment payers, this approach helps clients begin to get the cash back faster. 

The second option is to acquire orders from third-party debt. Directly from the debtor’s bank or building society account, settlement can be obtained. A combination of warning about or summoning the debtor to court is often the best approach, but these should be merged with tactics. 


Image via Shutterstock

Execution is key to recovering a receivable. 

Yet another option is to charge orders. Businesses can place a charge against a debtor’s property on or off the market. However, this approach requires deeper insight into the ownership status of the property, existing charges and third parties to the property. This is often regarded as a safety net approach and close to return cash.

Nevertheless, if the debtor does not have the assets or the means to pay, or is protected by an Ltd. company that does not have the assets to pay, none of the above tactics will be as valuable. 

Want to learn more about the latest in communications and technology? Then be sure to attend ITEXPO Miami 2013, Jan 29- Feb. 1 in Miami, Florida.  Stay in touch with everything happening at ITEXPO (News - Alert). Follow us on Twitter.




Edited by Braden Becker

Article comments powered by Disqus

Related Accounts Receivable Management Articles

TransFirst and PatientPay Partner on Enhanced Healthcare Payment Solution

There are few vertical markets where making the invoicing and payment process more provider and customer friendly is as complex and mission critical than in healthcare. For this reason the announcement of a sales partnership between Hauppauge, NY-based TransFirst, a provider of electronic transaction processing services and Durham, NC-based PatientPay, an online practice management and payment technology for healthcare practices is noteworthy. [ Read More ]
09/03/2015

Credit and Collection Association Pushes Back on RoboKiller

ACA International voices concerns over new TCPA rules regarding robocalling. [ Read More ]
08/27/2015

Epicor Accounts Receivable Management Automation Solution Speeds Invoice Collection

Those of us who cover the accounts receivable management (ARM) solutions space understand that use cases demonstrating the utility of ARM are sensitive. Customers of ARM solutions are hesitant to disclose their identities for obvious reasons. [ Read More ]
08/26/2015

Gryphon Partners with TouchTone for Indemnified Do-Not-Call Compliance Services

Gryphon partnership with TouchTone aimed at dealing with robocalling issues in U.S. [ Read More ]
08/20/2015

Events

Weekly Live Demo
Contact Center Solutions

Register Today!


Weekly Live Demo
CaaS Small Center

Register Today!